FOCAL POINT AGENCY / Website Accessibility & ADA Compliance

Website Accessibility & ADA Compliance

Strategy, creative direction, user experience, technology, production, and quality brought together around the outcome your organization needs.

Website Accessibility & ADA Compliance service illustration

ONE CONNECTED
PERSPECTIVE

Strategy, creative direction, user experience, technology, production, and quality work as one connected service perspective. The exact scope is confirmed after discovery.

A SCOPED ENGAGEMENT

What an engagement may include

An assessment is not useful when its questions, sampling, evaluation method, and next steps are undefined. The scope below is discussed before work begins.

01

Scope and standards alignment

Agree the technical standard, applicable scope, and representative pages or journeys.

02

Automated checks as one input

Use tools to surface candidates for review without treating them as a complete answer.

03

Manual and human evaluation

Review selected experiences with assistive technology and interaction testing.

01

Keyboard and interaction review

Examine keyboard navigation, focus visibility, order, controls, dialogs, and task completion.

02

Content and asset review

Consider headings, link purpose, media, documents, forms, and reusable templates.

03

Prioritized issue reporting

Organize findings by affected journey, impact, evidence, and remediation clarity.

01

Remediation support

Discuss recommendations, implementation responsibilities, and verification.

02

Retesting specified areas

Revisit agreed issues or journeys after changes.

03

Ongoing accessibility planning

Consider maintenance practices for future content, releases, QA, and team knowledge.

START WITH YOUR CONTEXT

Who this is for

Different organizations face different accessibility questions. These examples can frame a conversation, not determine legal obligations.

01

Businesses open to the public

Explore barriers that may affect visitors using the website.

02

State and local government teams

Discuss public-facing services and obligations with qualified legal counsel where needed.

03

Federal and Section 508 teams

Align procurement, content, and technical expectations around applicable requirements.

04

Redesign and procurement teams

Bring accessibility questions into planning before a build or vendor decision.

05

Teams seeking a roadmap

Turn an unclear question into prioritized discussion of barriers, ownership, and next steps.

A PROPOSED ENGAGEMENT PATH

A typical assessment-to-remediation path

The five-step path illustrates how work might progress after the scope, method, and evidence requirements are agreed.

01

Define the scope

Agree goals, standards, technical criteria, assets, journeys, and exclusions.

02

Evaluate the experience

Assess selected areas using the agreed combination of tools, manual review, and human evaluation.

03

Prioritize barriers

Connect findings to affected journeys and prepare an actionable order for review.

04

Remediate and support

Coordinate recommendations or implementation support around the agreed scope.

05

Retest and maintain

Retest specified areas and consider ongoing review practices.

DECISION GUIDANCE

ADA, Section 508, and WCAG are not interchangeable

These terms relate to digital accessibility in different ways. This content is general information, not legal advice.

  • ADA: a civil-rights law often discussed in relation to access to goods and services.
  • Section 508: federal accessibility requirements tied to covered information and communication technology.
  • WCAG: technical accessibility guidelines organized around perceivable, operable, understandable, and robust content.
  • Legal applicability should be confirmed with qualified counsel.
  • A technical review does not itself determine legal compliance.
  • The agreed version, level, sample, method, and findings should be documented.

EVIDENCE / APPROVAL REQUIRED

Evidence belongs in the conversation

Verified accessibility work will be described with approved scope, standards, evidence, remediation activity, and outcomes.

01

Approved evidence placeholder 01

Verified project context, approved contribution, relevant deliverables, and an attributable result will appear here.

02

Approved evidence placeholder 02

Verified project context, approved contribution, relevant deliverables, and an attributable result will appear here.

03

Approved evidence placeholder 03

Verified project context, approved contribution, relevant deliverables, and an attributable result will appear here.

Only verified, approved client names, claims, metrics, quotations, and outcomes should replace these placeholders.

GOOD QUESTIONS

Website accessibility FAQs

It is a scoped review of selected pages, components, content, and tasks against agreed technical criteria and evaluation methods.

No. Automated tools can identify some candidates, but meaningful evaluation also requires manual review and, where appropriate, human testing.

They are not interchangeable. ADA and Section 508 are legal frameworks with different applicability; WCAG is a technical guideline. Seek legal advice for obligations.

Remediation support can be scoped, including implementation guidance, coordination, and retesting of agreed areas.

Pages, templates, navigation, forms, media, documents, components, and selected user journeys can be included when agreed.

Yes, when explicitly included in the scope and supported by the available source files and review method.

START WITH THE RIGHT QUESTIONS

Request an accessibility assessment

Tell us what your team needs to understand and which digital experiences matter most.

Submitting this form starts a project conversation. Scope, timing, responsibilities, and outcomes are confirmed before work begins.